REVISTA DE EDUCATIE MEDICALA CONTINUA DEDICATA GINECOLOGILOR,
OBSTETRICENILOR, MOASELOR SI ASISTENTILOR MEDICALI DIN ROMANIA

Trimiterea manuscriselor


Ginecologia.ro



Romanian Society of Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Romanian Society of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecology
Romanian Society for Human Papillomavirus



 


Submiterea manuscriselor
Toate manuscrisele vor fi submise on-line si supuse procesului de peer review.
Accesând meniul din stânga paginii, click "Inregistrare & Log In", unde va trebui să introduceţi câteva date cu caracter personal. După înregistrare, veţi primi automat un e-mail, cu username-ul şi parola pentru logare.


Reviewerii sunt rugati sa completeze forma de peer review de mai jos intr-un timp cat mai scurt posibil si apoi sa o trimiteata catre Editor.

 PEER REVIEW FORM

JOURNAL:

 

TITLE:

 

AUTHORS:

 

REFERENCE NUMBER:

 

 

Quick summary of the manuscript: ……………………………………………………………………………...

………………………………………………………………………………………………............………………………….

 

 

Is the manuscript of sufficient originality to warrant publication in the journal?

(Manuscripts that are scientifically flawed, provide no new insight, merely report observations without analysis or comment, are incomplete or are of sufficient significance, should be rejected).                                                                                                                                                              YES/NO                       

Comments……………………...........yes……………………………………………………………………………………………..

 

Is the manuscript sufficiently novel and interesting to warrant publications?

(Does it add to the canon of knowledge? Is the research question an important, valid, significant one?)                                                                                                                                                 YES/NO

Comments:.....................................yes…………………………………………………………………………………………….

 

Title

(Does it clearly describe the manuscript?)                                                                            YES/NO

Comments:...................................yes………………..................……………………………………………………….

 

Does the Abstract reflect the content of the manuscript?                                         YES/NO

Are the originality and importance of the manuscript stated?                              YES/NO                                                                                                                                                       

Comments:...................................yes…………………………………………………………………………………….

 

Introduction

(Does it accurately describe what the author hoped to achieve/how original is it, and clearly state the problem being investigated and its importance?)                                                       YES/NO

Comments:..................................yes……………………………………..............…………………………………

 

Are the design and methodology appropriate?

(Does the author accurately explain inclusion, and exclusion criteria, recruitment methods, intervention (if an interventional study) and how the data was collected? Is the design suitable for answering the question posed? Was an adequate follow-up interval planned, if appropriate (e.g. for onco- or urogynecology)? Is there sufficient information present for you to replicate the research? Does the manuscript identify the procedures followed? Are these ordered in a meaningful way? If the methods are new, are they explained in detail? Was the sampling appropriate? Have the equipment and materials been adequately described? Does the manuscript make it clear what type of data was recorded; has the author been precise in describing measurements? A power analysis, if appropriate was performed before beginning the research, in order to determine the sample size necessary to demonstrate the working hypothesis? Authors describe which tests were used to evaluate a specific data set and why, dependent variables, independent variables, comparisons, primary and secondary analyses, “p” value accepted as significant?) 

                                                                                    YES/NO

Comments:................................yes…………………………………………………………………….....…….

 

Results

(Are results correctly/adequately described? Are subjects correctly described: numbers approached, enrolled, excluded, characteristics? Are main analysis and secondary analysis results described? Is an appropriate analysis been conducted? Are the results supported by statistics? Are the statistics correct? Are the differences reported in the statistical analysis of sufficient magnitude to be of biological/clinical significance?)                                   YES/NO                                                                            

Comments:.............................yes…………………………………………………………………………………….

 

Are all necessary figures (images) included & are they of sufficient quality?

                                                                                                                                                           YES/NO   

Comments:.............................yes……………………………………………………………………………………….

 

Do you consider Discussion section adequate?

(Are the claims in this section supported by the results, do they seem reasonable? Have the authors indicated how the results relate to expectations and to earlier research? Does the manuscript support or contradict previous theories? Are the strengths and weaknesses or likely biases of the study correctly described? Does the author(s) correctly explain the importance/originality of the study, how it is a valuable contribution to the international literature?)                                                                                                                                                                                                               YES/NO

Comments:..............................yes……………………………………………………………………………………….

 

Does the conclusions explain how the research has moved the body of scientific knowledge forward? Are the study’s originality/relevance stated?                                                           
                                                                                                                                                YES/NO                                

Comments:............................yes……………………………………………………………………………………….

 

Language

(Is the manuscript correctly written? You do not need to correct the English, but you may do so. You may wish to bring it to the attention of the Editor, however).            YES/NO

Comments:...........................yes…………………………………………………………………………………………….

 

Is the manuscript sensibly arranged? Is it clear and concise?

(If not, but is otherwise acceptable, please suggest necessary improvements)         YES/NO   

Comments:............................yes………………………………....…………………………………………………….

 

RECOMMENDATION

(Please accompany this report with any detailed comments)

Text Box: xAccept

Accept pending minor revisions

Reconsider after major revision

Reject

I think it is a very clean and good original research paper

 

Reviewer:…………………
Date:…………………………


© 2008-2018 revistaginecologia.ro. All rights reserved
created by if else factory