REVISTA DE EDUCATIE MEDICALA CONTINUA DEDICATA GINECOLOGILOR,
OBSTETRICENILOR, MOASELOR SI ASISTENTILOR MEDICALI DIN ROMANIA

<- Home <- Arhive <- Anul 7, Nr. 26, Decembrie 2019



RevistaGinecologia7(26)36-38(2019)
© VERSA PULS MEDIA, S.R.L.


Sacrocolpopexy – advantages and disadvantages of abdominal and laparoscopic approaches. A systematic review and meta-analysis

MC Dumitrașcu, R Fodoroiu, CG Nenciu, F Şandru, A Petca, R Petca, MM Cîrstoiu


Rezumat: Pelvic organ prolapse has become a common problem among women and, because of its increasing incidence, several surgical techniques have been developed. The current gold standard surgical repair for pelvic organ prolapse is the abdominal sacrocolpopexy, because of its high success rate and excellent anatomic outcome. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy has become an alternative for the abdominal approach. The aim of this systematic review is to compare the advantages and disadvantages between the laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and the abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Cuvinte cheie: laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, abdominal sacrocolpopexy, pelvic organ prolapse.

Full Text in PDF
© 2008-2020 revistaginecologia.ro. All rights reserved
created by if else factory